Robertson

Robertson v. Drew

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 125·34 Cal. App. 143·166 P. 838
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 1917Civ. No. 1895.California1,027 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Plaintiff prosecuted this appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action on a lease to recover rent.

In August, 1913, plaintiff leased certain premises to the defendant for the term of one year from August 11, 1913, with the privilege to defendant of “renewing the lease” for a further term of from one to five years. On August 11, 1914, the defendant wrote a letter to the plaintiff stating in part that he had elected to take the premises for a further period of two years. On August 21st the plaintiff replied to this letter saying: “If you will call at the office we will fix you up.” Defendant, however, did not call, but remained in the premises, paying the same rent as before, until the month of January following, when he gave up possession without the consent of the plaintiff. The premises remained unoccupied until August 14, 1916. It is sought in this action to recover an amount representing rent payable up to the date last mentioned under the claim that by the foregoing correspondence the lease had been renewed for the term indicated.

First in order of presentation and importance is the question whether the term of the lease was so extended.

There appears by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.