Wilson

People v. Wilson

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 207·86 Cal. App. 160·260 P. 330
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1927Docket No. 1381.California1,541 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Appellants, together with Charles Carlisle and Ernest Apac, were jointly indicted by the grand jury of the city and county of San Francisco of the crime of robbery. Carlisle and Apac were not apprehended and now are fugitives from justice. Defendants Wilson and De Bardeleben, appellants herein, were jointly tried in said city and county upon the charge and were convicted of robbery in the second degree. The indictment is in two counts. The first charges the four defendants with the commission of the crime of robbery committed on the eleventh day of November, 1926, at an unknown place in the state of California. It alleges that defendants feloniously took from the person of one Harold Turney certain personal property by putting him in fear and that thereafter they brought said property into the city and county of San Francisco. The second count is identical with the first except that it accused the same persons of committing the same crime against the person of Margaret Turney, wife of Harold Turney. Defendants were found guilty upon both counts. In brief, the evidence shows that defendants, both ex-convicts, had planned with Turney and his wife for an automobile trip. On November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.