Estate of Heeney

In Re Estate of Heeney

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 293·3 Cal. App. 548·86 P. 842
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 1906Civ. No. 141.California1,927 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, J.

Richard Heeney died intestate in 1892, leaving five children who were his only heirs. Of these children, Mary E., died in December, 1896, William in April, 1900, Lulia A., in May, 1901, and Walter in April, 1903. The only survivor, Richard J., is respondent herein, and the husband and child of Lulia A., as her sole heirs, are appellants. William left a widow, but neither Mary nor Walter were ever married. By reason of a tacit understanding or agreement among the heirs, no administration was had upon the father’s estate until March 8, 1901, when letters were issued to the respondent. The only property consisted of the family residence or home, and up to May, 1903, it was used as the residence and home of the family under a mutual agreement between them. From May, 1903, until February,' 1904, the home was occupied by the appellant and his child. When Richard Heeney died, his property was mortgaged for the sum of five hundred dollars, and in 1895, the two adult sons, William and Richard J., paid the mortgage debt and caused the mortgage to be assigned to their sister Mary under an agreement, and pursuant to the advice of their attorney that it should be assigned to the oldest member…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.