Bryan

Bryan v. Baymiller

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 576·95 Cal. App. 481·272 P. 1106
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 1928Docket No. 3661.California1,986 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jamison, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate entered into between him and defendant Baymiller Post Company and to recover the sum of $4,250 paid by him on the purchase price of said land under said contract and for damages in case rescission cannot be had.

Defendants answered, denying the material allegations of the complaint and setting up that plaintiff was guilty of laches in attempting to rescind the contract and that he had waived the alleged fraud of defendants, and also filed a cross-complaint demanding judgment in favor of defendant Pacific Land Company, to whom said contract had been assigned, for the remainder of the purchase price called for by said contract, to wit, $4,500.

Judgment went for defendants and in favor of the Pacific Land Company on the cross-complaint for the said sum of $4,500.

As ground for rescinding the said contract plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the consideration passing to him under the contract has wholly failed in this, that by said contract Baymiller Post Company agreed that they would bore wells and install pumps and construct a water system necessary to irrigate the lands described in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.