Fiedler

Fiedler v. Allen

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 622·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 500·4 P.2d 292
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 1931Docket No. 6707.California1,476 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

On December 27, 1926, the J. E. K. Financial Service, Inc. (hereinafter called Financial Service), as principal, and the American Surety Company of New York, as surety, executed on behalf of said Financial Service a broker’s bond as required by section 5 of the Corporate Securities Act as amended in the year 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 967). The bond was executed for the calendar year 1927. During the period of the transactions referred to herein, said Financial Service was engaged in business as a licensed broker in this state, and said undertaking was in force. This action was brought to recover judgment under and within the terms of said undertaking.

On September 30, 1927, the defendant Allen qualified under appointment as receiver of said Financial Service, and under permission duly given he was made defendant in this action. Judgment was entered against the Surety Company alone in the sum of #3,090, plus #30.21 costs. The judgment is silent concerning any right of action of plaintiff against the receiver. From that judgment the Surety Company prosecutes this appeal.

The conditions of the undertaking were such that if the principal, and any and all agents and employees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.