Cox

Cox v. Odell

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 682·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 160·82 P. 1086
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1905No. 12.California1,395 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The record discloses an attempt at appeal from the judgment, but inasmuch as the same was not perfected until after the lapse of one year from the rendition of judgment, the same is ineffectual and must be dismissed. Entertaining the views hereafter expressed, we mav disregard the motion to dismiss the appeal from the order

The only points in the record in this case here presented are that the evidence is not sufficient to justify the findings, and that errors of law warranting reversal of the order occurred at the trial.

As to the first point, while there is a conflict in many respects, there is evidence sufficient to support the findings. The findings and the evidence develop that the defendant’s land adjoins the land of plaintiff on the east and is of a higher elevation than the land of plaintiff, and the water coming to said lands during rains flowed naturally westward in no definite channel, but widely and evenly diffused over the whole surface and doing no damage to plaintiff’s land. The defendant, along his west line, being the dividing-line between the lands of plaintiff and defendant, constructed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.