In Re Bergen

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 539·61 Cal. App. 226·214 P. 521
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1923Crim. No. 930.California955 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The complaint, in so far as it is material here, reads as follows:

Petitioner contends that this complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. The language of the section of the statute (Stats. 1917, p. 221) under which the charge is made reads as follows:

“Subdivision 3. Carrying Firearms Without License, Misdemeanor. Every person who carries in any city, city and county, town or municipal corporation of this State, any pistol, revolver, or other firearm concealed upon his person without having a license to carry such firearm as hereinafter provided in Section 6 of this Act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.”

Section 1426 of the Penal Code requires that the complaint through which an action for a public offense is begun must set forth “the offense charged, with such particulars of time, place, person and property as to enable the defendant to understand distinctly the character of the offense complained of, and to answer the complaint.”

It seems apparent that in any accusation the name given the offense by the pleader is separate from the charging part of the instrument. This was held to be the rule in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.