Horne

Horne v. Hughes

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 6·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 95·124 P. 736
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 1912Civ. No. 872.California438 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The allegations of the complaint, in substance, are these: Plaintiff bought of defendant an undivided half interest in a tract of land at Wilmington, paying therefor the sum of $675, defendant executing to plaintiff a bargain and sale deed. At the time of the sale and conveyance the defendant represented to plaintiff that she had a good and perfect title to the land and authority to sell and convey the same. Plaintiff relied upon these representations and believed them to be true, and upon the faith thereof paid the purchase price and accepted the conveyance. As a matter of fact, defendant had no title to said premises and owned no interest therein; that she believed at the time, as did plaintiff, that a certain conveyance theretofore made under which she claimed title was valid, hut in truth the same was a forgery, and defendant by reason thereof derived no title on account of such conveyance; that plaintiff did not discover this fact until in the year 1908, when such deed so made to defendant was by a court of competent jurisdiction declared to be invalid and a forgery. The action was brought to recover the amount of the purchase price so paid, with interest. A general demurrer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.