Letteau

Letteau v. Dumas

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 542·99 Cal. App. 230·278 P. 459
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1929Docket No. 3775.California1,418 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit to quiet title.

The plaintiff is the owner of the eight lots described in the complaint, which are a part of Tract 7603 of the city of Los Angeles. November 5, 1923, the defendants prepared and sent to the plaintiff a written communication in the form of a tentative agreement or offer to buy these eight lots upon specified terms for the sum of $28,500. This agreement was accompanied by $7,050 as part payment. The document described them with reference to an unrecorded map. So far as the record shows, the plaintiff had nothing to do with the preparation of this instrument, which appears to have been voluntarily prepared and signed by the defendants alone, and was addressed to the plaintiff, who received and retained the money. This written offer to purchase the lots was, however, indorsed by one H. R. Cowan, as follows:

This was not a contract binding the plaintiff to sell these lots. It was a mere" conditional offer on the part of the defendants to buy the lots. Subsequently, on December 27, 1923, the map of said tract was duly recorded. Thereafter, on January 14, 1924, eight independent contracts for the sale of the lots were executed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.