Grunsky

Grunsky v. Field

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 623·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 173·82 P. 979
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1905No. 58.California1,014 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McLAUGHLIN, J.

Defendant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for .a new trial. The action was brought to recover commissions on a sale of real estate, under a contract which reads as follows: “Field Ranch March 11, 1903. In consideration of one dollar the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I authorize Grunsky & Dietrich, for five months, to sell my farm of 160 acres, including standing crop, for $65.00 per acre, and I agree if any sale results through the efforts of said Grunsky & Dietrich, at above or less price, to pay them the commissions of 5 per cent. J. L. Field.”

On April 17, 1903, the property was sold to C. J. Bender for the sum of $10,400, and the court found that such sale resulted through the efforts of the respondents.

The main point urged upon this appeal is that such finding is not supported by the evidence. An examination of the record, however, discloses a substantial conflict in the evidence on this point, and under the well-settled rule such finding will not be disturbed. (White v. Beer, 105 Cal. 9 , [ 38 Pac. 513 ]; Taylor v. McConigle, 120 Cal. 125 , [ 52 Pac. 159 ]; Raymond v. Glover, 144 Cal. 548 , [ 78 Pac. 3 ].).

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.