Weldy

Stanton v. Weldy

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 374·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 21·126 P. 175
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1912Civ. No. 971.California1,319 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

This is an action on two certain instruments, alleged to be promissory notes, each reading as follows:

Alleging nonpayment and that the sum of $150 is a reasonable attorney’s fee to be allowed in the action, the prayer is for judgment for $1,177.50, principal and interest, and $150, attorneys’ fees.

General and special demurrers were overruled and defendants filed a verified answer to the unverified complaint, denying, on information and belief, its averments alleging the execution and delivery of said promissory notes; denying directly that there is due and owing or unpaid the principal or interest or any other amount; and, for further answer, alleged that defendants “received no consideration for the so-called promissory note set forth in said first cause of action,” and like averments as to the second alleged cause of action. The cause was tried by a jury and, by the direction of the court, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from the judgment on the verdict and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff raised the point on the answer that the denial on information and belief was not a sufficient denial of the execution of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.