Ravn

Ravn v. Planz

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 357·37 Cal. App. 735·174 P. 690
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 1918Civ. No. 2418.California624 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the action because not brought to trial within five years after the defendant filed his answer.

Section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an action “shall be dismissed ... on motion of the defendant, after due notice to plaintiff or by the court on its own motion, unless such action is brought to trial within five years after the defendant has filed his answer, except where the parties have stipulated in writing that the time may be extended.” This action was not brought to trial within the designated time, and it is not claimed that the parties entered into a stipulation in writing extending the time within which it might be tried. To save this case from the operation of the statute the plaintiff shows that on several occasions the trial of the action was postponed upon the motion of defendant, and that upon a date within about six months prior to the expiration of the five years after the case was at issue, it being then upon the -calendar for trial, he appeared in court with his counsel and witnesses ready to proceed, but upon motion of the defendant, and over his objection, a further postponement of the trial was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.