Matter of Application of Hines

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 165·33 Cal. App. 45·164 P. 339·164 P.2d 339
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1917Crim. No. 517.California1,067 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

The petitioner is held in custody by the city marshal of the city of Venice, a city of the sixth class. His imprisonment is pursuant to a judgment of conviction of the offense of operating and maintaining a laundry wagon for the soliciting and delivery of laundry work in the city of Venice without having first procured a license therefor as provided by an ordinance of that city; it being charged that the petitioner was operating and maintaining said wagon for the delivery of laundry work to and from a laundry situated outside of the limits of the city of Venice. He was sentenced to pay a fine, with the alternative of one day’s imprisonment for each dollar of such fine being unpaid, and he refused to pay the fine; thereupon he was committed to the custody of the marshal to be imprisoned until, at the rate aforesaid, the fine shall be paid.

Ordinance No. 510 of the city of Venice is an ordinance providing for licensing and regulating the carrying on of certain described businesses. Subdivision 34 of section 10 of that ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 636, establishes the rate of licenses for certain businesses and occupations; and so far as applicable to this ease, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.