West

West v. Visalia Abstract Co.

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 297·53 Cal. App. 467·200 P. 351
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 1921Civ. No. 2274.California2,026 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The record justifies this statement of facts: Messrs. Gibson, Quinn, and Snell were the owners of a certain tract of land in Tulare County. Mr. Gibson agreed with one J. W. Fewel that if the latter would find a purchaser for the land that the owners would sell it for sixty-five thousand dollars cash and Fewel could retain all above that sum that the purchaser might pay for the land. Fewel at once entered into a verbal agreement with one J. E. West that if the latter would assist the former in finding a purchaser they would divide the profits or commissions equally, and, if desirable, they would obtain the assistance of a third party, and in that event they would divide the commissions equally among the three in case of sale. West then approached intervener John Goree and told him of this tract of land and of the terms upon which it could be purchased, and stated that if he would find a purchaser they would divide the profits or commissions equally, that is, that Fewel, West, and Goree would each receive one-third thereof. West told Goree that Fewel only had a verbal agreement with the owners of the land, but that on account of the close personal and business relations between Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.