Sweet

Van Zandt v. Sweet

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 598·56 Cal. App. 164·204 P. 860
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 1922Civ. No. 3569.California1,083 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant appeals.

At the time of the accident, August 28, 1919, plaintiff was in the service of an employer who had been insured by the state compensation insurance fund against liability for compensation to an employee. During plaintiff’s cross-examination the fact was brought out that he had made application to the Industrial Accident Commission for compensation under the workmen’s compensation law (Stats. 1917, p. 831) and that he had been paid such compensation by his employer’s insurance carrier, the state compensation insurance fund. Thereupon defendant moved the court for a nonsuit on the ground that plaintiff had received compensation under the workmen’s compensation law. The motion was denied. Later, and after both parties had introduced their evidence and rested, defendant requested the court to peremptorily instruct the jury to return a verdict for defendant. The requested instruction was denied. This request for a peremptory instruction was made for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.