Beatty

Beatty v. Rianda

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 115·34 Cal. App. 180·167 P. 185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 1917Civ. No. 2053.California1,373 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

The plaintiff Margaret 'Jane Beatty, joining with her husband, brought suit to have declared null and void the sale by defendant Clark Colony Water Company of stock owned by her in said corporation made by reason of the nonpayment of an assessment levied by the corporation upon the stock. Andrea Rianda, the codefendant, was the purchaser at such sale. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs annulling said sale and reinstating Margaret Jane Beatty as a stockholder of the corporation, from which the defendants have appealed.

The principal ground of attack upon said delinquent sale is that the special meeting at which the assessment was levied was not regularly called in accordance with the by-laws of the corporation. In that behalf one of said by-laws provides: “Article XIII. . . . Special meetings of the board may be called at the option of the president or two directors, upon notice in writing being mailed at Greenfield at least three days prior to the day of meeting, or upon two days personal notice to each director. Such service of notice shall be entered upon the minutes of the corporation, and the said minutes upon being read and approved at a subsequent meeting of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.