Hughes

J. F. Hall-Martin Co. v. Hughes

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 513·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 288·123 P. 617
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1912Civ. No. 1075.California1,244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The facts disclosed by the record are these: During the year 1909 defendant entered into an agreement in writing with Daniel Stone and Paul H. Blades for the sale of certain real property in Los Angeles.county. Stone and Blades entered into possession and formed a corporation known as the Central Square Company, which corporation was merely a corporate agency in and about the subdivision and improvement and sale of the property. Default being made by Stone and Blades as to certain payments, they entered into an agreement with defendant through which Stone and Blades and the corporation conveyed all claim to the property so contracted to purchase, in consideration of which defendant agreed to pay certain indebtedness theretofore created by Stone and Blades and the corporation in an effort at subdivision and sale of the property. This agreement, in so far as material to a disposition of the questions presented upon this appeal, recited as follows: “ [Hughes] promises and agrees to assume and pay all those debts of the Central Square Company, -as follows: Martin and Hall for street improvements, eight thousand • two hundred dollars ($8200); mortgage indebtedness on houses erected on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.