Schumacher

Schumacher v. Langford

Good Law
1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 138·20 Cal. App. 61·127 P. 1057
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 1912Civ. No. 1027.California1,769 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of obtaining a writ of mandate, commanding the defendant, as sheriff of the county of Santa Clara, to execute and deliver to plaintiff a deed of conveyance of certain real estate theretofore sold by him under execution. Judgment was entered as prayed, and this appeal is from such judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The facts of the case are that on December 21, 1906, a judgment was duly rendered against Ada B. Moody for a certain sum of money. On July 10, 1907, the judgment being still in full force, a writ of execution was duly, issued thereon, to satisfy which the defendant, as sheriff of said county of Santa Clara, on the eighth day of August, 1907, regularly sold to the plaintiff the property described in the complaint belonging to the judgment debtor, Mrs. Ada B. Moody.

On the seventh day of August, 1908, Mrs. Moody called at the office of Herman Murphy, a loan broker doing business in San Francisco, and informed him that the following day would be the last on which he could redeem such property, and requested him to obtain for her the sum of $2,300 to assist her in effecting a redemption thereof.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.