Comer

Comer v. Associated Almond Growers

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 687·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 1001·282 P. 532
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1929Docket No. 7109.California1,167 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action to recover a judgment against the defendant for money. Thereafter they filed a second amended complaint. The defendant demurred. Its demurrer was overruled and thereafter it filed an answer which, among other things, pleaded an earlier judgment as a bar. A trial was had in the trial court before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed. In their second amended complaint the plaintiffs alleged the corporate capacity of the defendant; that on the first day of November, 1922, the plaintiffs commenced an action, No. 7251, records of the county clerk of San Luis Obispo County, in specific performance against the defendant to compel the defendant to execute a deed to certain lands, and if it be found that defendant was unable to convey said premises, then to recover judgment in the sum of $15,000, which sum was alleged to be the value of the premises in controversy at the time of the commencement of the action; that the action came on for trial; that the plaintiffs offered to prove by Frank W. Aston that at the time action No. 7251 was commenced,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.