Federal M.L. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 269·295 P. 379
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1931Docket Nos. 7569, 7570.California3,708 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

These two proceedings for the writ of review are directed at a single award made by the Industrial Accident Commission. Accordingly, they have been consolidated for hearing and determination. On July 30, 1926, respondent Engelbert, then an employee of a corporation known as the Celite Company, was injured by a fracture of the tibia of his left leg. Petitioner in the two proceedings above entitled was the insurance carrier of the Celite Company. Engelbert made claim for his injury before the Industrial Accident Commission with the result that an award of compensation was made in his favor and against the Celite Company. This award has long since been paid in full. Because of a certain casualty which occurred on February 27, 1930, which involved the fracture above mentioned and out of which arose a second controversy before the Industrial Accident Commission, it becomes necessary to particularize the condition of Engelbert's leg at various periods between July 30, 1926, and February 27, 1930, as well as to set forth a statement of the activities of the injured man during the same interval of time. On November 21, 1928, Dr. Karshner, who had taken X-ray photographs of Engelbert's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.