Dunn

Dunn v. Security-First National Bank

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 541·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 710·21 P.2d 647
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1933Docket No. 8755.California1,246 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The action herein is one to rescind two contracts for the purchase of two lots from the defendant Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles, as trustee, and to recover from the defendants Flint, Jackstadt and others, as beneficiaries under the trust, the amounts paid by plaintiffs on said contracts, upon the ground that the defendants last named and their agents induced plaintiffs to purchase said lots by means of false and fraudulent representations. The trial court found in favor of plaintiffs on all issues, except the amount claimed to be due; and judgment was entered accordingly for the repayment to plaintiffs of the sum of $1966.30, interest and costs. From such judgments the defendants Flint and Jackstadt prosecute this appeal.

The lots were part of a subdivision situate near Point Fermín, Los Angeles County, and sales were being promoted through selling agents and lectures delivered in a tent near the subdivision. The respondents, Mrs. Dunn and Miss Marshall, formerly resided in Mississippi. They were in moderate financial circumstances and inexperienced in business. They arrived in Long Beach on June 10, 1927, and took accommodations at an apartment house. Within a few…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.