Maginnis

Maginnis v. Hurlbutt

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 53·34 Cal. App. 504·168 P. 368
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1917Civ. No. 1676.California2,685 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Plaintiff brings the action to quiet title to certain lands of which he claims to be the owner and entitled to possession. The complaint was filed December 1, 1913. The land is described as situated in the county of Lake and bounded and described as follows: “Fraction in S. % of N. E. % and fraction in N. % of S. E. 1/4 and fraction in N. E. % of S. W. % of section 36, all in T. 14 N., R. 9 W., M. D. M.; and more particularly described in field-notes of the survey thereof, as follows: Beginning at a point on the meander line of Clear Lake, in front of section 36, in T. 14 N. , R. 9 W., M. D. M., 25.24 chains east of the quarter-section corner between sections 35 and 36 and run east 14.76 chains,' to center of section; thence north 5.66 chains to margin of Clear Lake; thence along margin of lake, south 63% degrees east 9.42 chains; thence north 57% degrees east 5.47 chains; thence north 78% degrees east 5.16 chains; thence south 65 degrees east 7 chains; thence south 7% degrees west 11.99 chains, to meander line of Clear Lake; thence following the meander line north 80 degrees west, 23 chains; thence north 70 degrees west 15.77 chains, to the place of beginning, containing 30.56…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.