Dolley

Bayside Land Co. v. Dolley

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 253·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 865·284 P. 479
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 1930Docket No. 40.California1,959 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marks, J.

The appellant city of Seal Beach is a municipal corporation of the sixth class, situated within the county of Orange, state of California, and the other appellants composed its board of trustees, at all times material to this proceeding. Respondent is a corporation that owned about seven hundred lots within the city of Seal Beach, of which at least a large number were subjected to the assessment sought to be voided by the writ of review granted by the trial court herein. For convenience we will refer to the city of Seal Beach as the city, and the individual appellants as the board of trustees.

On April 7, 1927, the board of trustees passed a resolution whereby it instituted proceedings to abate noxious and dangerous weeds upon certain lots within the city, under an act of the legislature of the state of California approved May 26, 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 841), -which we will refer to as the Weed Abatement Act. The proceedings were taken to the point of receiving the report and assessment of the street superintendent by the board of trustees, without objection on the part of property owners. Respondent filed its protest to this report and assessment, which, was overruled by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.