Peterson

Peterson v. Chorley

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 783·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 913·284 P. 956
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 1930Docket No. 6091.California1,708 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

An action to determine the respective interests of the defendants in a fund in the possession of the plaintiff.

The facts are as follows: Peter J. McGovern, who died on March 15, 1922, by his last will disposed of a portion of his estate; the residue passed by the law of succession to his heirs, among whom was his sister Bridget Cullen. The lat ter executed to E. A. Platt a power of attorney to act for her in the matter of the estate, and also assigned to him one-third of her interest therein. In June, 1922, Platt executed his power of attorney to defendant McColgan, giving him full power to act under the Cullen assignment and power of attorney, the purpose being to secure the repayment to McColgan of sums loaned to Platt. Defendant Ford, an attorney representing Mrs. Cullen, Platt and one Blakemore, appeared in the proceeding and procured a p*artial distribution of the estate. Shortly thereafter Isidor Golden, an attorney, was substituted for Ford as the attorney for Mrs. Cullen, and the latter thereupon instituted an action against Platt and all those to whom he had given powers of attorney or assignments, including defendant McColgan, to cancel and annul her assignment to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.