Zimmer

Zimmer v. Edinger

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 973·91 Cal. App. 435·267 P. 110
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1928Docket No. 5130.California1,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

This is an action for real estate commission. Plaintiff alleged three causes of action in his second amended complaint. The answer admits there was an authorization in writing from defendant to plaintiff as alleged in the complaint, but denies that any sale was consummated thereunder or commission earned. The court’s findings are that plaintiff’s allegations are true in the main, and judgment was awarded against defendant in the sum of $1,770, the full amount prayed for, together with costs. Defendant appeals from the judgment under the alternative method, and presses the points that the findings are not supported by the evidence and that the court committed error in the admission of evidence relating to custom in the matter of a cash deposit in escrow pending search of title, etc.

The facts relating to the first alleged cause of action are as follows: The defendant-appellant owned certain property in that part of the city of Los Angeles known as Sawtelle. The plaintiff-respondent, a real estate agent who had formerly done some business with appellant, and who was personally acquainted with him, was trying to arrange for the leasing of a theater which appellant contemplated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.