In Re Ferguson

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 605·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 980·11 P.2d 636
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 1932Docket No. 2227.California329 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

Petitioner was convicted in the superior court under a charge of possession of “metal knuckles”, so called, under the provision of an act of the legislature (Act 1970, Gen. Laws [1925-27], sec. 1), also to be found at page 542 of the Statutes of 1925, and is now in the custody of the sheriff pursuant to the judgment of conviction. Pie asked for the writ of habeas corpus and the writ issued.

The record made at the trial contains evidence tending to show that petitioner had owned the “knuckles” for very many years after a gift of them by his father, and had sometimes left them lying on shelves and sometimes had kept them in various places outside his actual manual possession. It was urged in argument by petitioner that under this and other evidence it was shown by the record, without dispute, that the weapons were possessed as heirlooms, mementoes, keepsakes and as curios. It was insisted that a possession of this nature, while undoubtedly within the letter of the statute, was not within its spirit.

Without deciding whether such a possession would render guiltless a defendant prosecuted under the statute, we are satisfied from evidence produced by the prosecution that the evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.