Grinnell

Grinnell v. Hill

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 492·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 201·82 P. 445
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 1905No. 50.California432 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note of date December 27, 1900, for the sum of $625, given for twenty-five hundred shares of Famosa Oil and Investment Company.

In the answer, besides the allegations as to the familiar and friendly, if not confidential, relations existing between the parties, it is alleged that the defendant was induced to purchase the stock, and to give the note sued on, by certain fraudulent representations, set forth specifically in the answer, which were, in effect: 1. That the plaintiff represented to the defendant that he had purchased five thousand shares ■of the stock referred to in the note at twenty-five cents a share, which was less than its market value, and that, on account of the friendly relations existing between them, he was willing to let the defendant have one half of the stock purchased at the price he had paid for it; 2. That the plaintiff had in fact purchased the stock at the price of ten cents a share, which was its full market value; 3. That the defendant saying that he had not the money to invest, the plaintiff proposed to him to give his note, representing to him that the stock could not be issued prior to about the fifteenth day •of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.