Stubblefield

Stubblefield v. Long

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 329·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 721·13 P.2d 862
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 1932Docket No. 7120.California334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

York, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to motion of defendants for lack of prosecution.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on September 6, 1927. Complaint was filed November 29, 1927; defendant demurred thereto, demurrer was overruled and answer was filed January 28, 1929.

On February 18, 1929, plaintiffs, pursuant to -rule I of the superior court, served and filed in the action a memorandum to the effect that motion would be made in department 34 of said court on the fourth day of March, 1929, to set said cause for trial on the ground that the case was at issue. Pursuant to rule II of said court, the cause was by the clerk of said court placed on the civil active list, and thereafter on the first day of April, 1929, in the absence of the parties thereto and their respective counsel, the said cause was, pursuant to rule III of said court, under the supervision of the presiding judge thereof, set for trial in department 43 of said court on the thirteenth day of May, 1929, at the hour of 9 :30 A. M.

On the thirteenth day of May, 1929, the canse was called for trial in the department named, defendants appearing by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.