Rea

Rea v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 663·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1103·19 P.2d 267
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1933Docket No. 7593.California1,571 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

In the month of July, 1926, defendant Security Trust and Savings Bank was the owner of a tract of land described as Tract No. 9033 in the county of Los Angeles, including lots 135 and 136 thereof. The bank arranged for subdivision of the property into blocks and lots, and engaged defendant J. B. Ransom Corporation as ■its agent in selling the lots. At the time of the transactions referred to herein defendant D. Jamieson was a sales agent for the Ransom Corporation. On July 5, 1926, Jamie-son solicited the plaintiffs to purchase lot 135, and succeeded in persuading them to buy said lot. Plaintiffs in their complaint alleged that in this transaction Jamieson was agent both for the bank and the Ransom Corporation. The court found, upon sufficient evidence, that he was acting for only the Ransom Corporation. Pursuant to these negotiations a contract of sale of said lot, dated July 16, 1926, was entered into between the bank and the plaintiffs. The sale price was $2,375, of which plaintiffs at that time paid $593.75 and agreed to pay the balance of the principal sum at the rate of $47.50 per month, with interest as stated in the contract.

In like manner and through the same agency, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.