Forbes

Clark v. Forbes

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 47·34 Cal. App. 524·168 P. 155
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 1917Civ. No. 2278.California798 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Appeal from judgment.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying his application for a writ of review. The judgment sought to be reviewed was rendered by respondent Forbes as justice of the peace of Los Angeles township, in Los Angeles County, in an action wherein John E. Lacey et al. were plaintiffs and James D. Clark was defendant. That judgment was rendered on the twenty-fifth day of May, 1916. The petition for writ of review was filed in the superior court within thirty days thereafter, which therefore was within the time in which an appeal might have been taken from the judgment.

The writ of review does not lie to review a judgment from which an appeal may be taken. Appellant claims that he had no right of appeal of which he could take advantage, because by taking an appeal he would submit to the jurisdiction and the point upon which he relies is that the justice’s court did not have jurisdiction of the person of him, the said James D. Clark, in that action. The decisions cited and relied upon [by him are In re Clarke, 125 Cal. 388 , [ 58 Pac. 22 ]; Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co., 2 Cal. App. 436, [ 83 Pac. 1077 ]; Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston etc. Co., 126 Cal. 418 ,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.