Menges

Menges v. Robinson

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 161·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 123·26 P.2d 882
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1933Docket No. 1412.California1,460 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

The plaintiff brought this action on a note for $5,000 dated August 18, 1931, due six months after date, payable to “Myself”. The note was signed and also indorsed on the back by all of the defendants except Chas. F. Carrere, and was also indorsed “Without recourse, Chas. F. Carrere”. It is alleged in the complaint that the note was made, executed and delivered to Chas. F. Carrere and that it was by him indorsed to the plaintiff in good faith in the usual course of business and for a valuable consideration. ' The defendants Mott and Bosch answered setting up failure of consideration and partial failure of consideration, and also alleging that the plaintiff fraudulently conspired with the said Carrere to obtain said note for a nominal consideration and that the plaintiff took the note with full knowledge and notice of all equities between Carrere and the other defendants. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000 and from the judgment which followed the plaintiff has appealed.

The main grounds for reversal urged are that the evidence conclusively shows that the appellant was a holder in due course and that the court erred in permitting testimony with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.