Good

Good v. Brown

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 107·40 Cal. App. 753·181 P. 802
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1919Civ. No. 1685.California1,556 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The appeal is from a judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage on real estate. On the twelfth day of June, 1912, the defendant George E. Brown delivered his promissory note in the sum of one thousand dollars, payable ninety days after date, to the plaintiff, and to secure its payment executed a chattel mortgage upon certain personal property. Defendant Cynthia Brown was not a party to this note or mortgage, and when this suit was brought no action had been taken toward enforcing said chattel mortgage, and it existed as a valid lien on said personal property. Thereafter, on February 27, 1914, both of said defendants executed the real estate mortgage to secure the payment of this note. The land is community property, and prior to the execution of said mortgage the said defendant Cynthia Brown had executed and recorded, in due form, a declaration of homestead on said property.

The foregoing facts are undisputed, and in addition it is claimed by appellants that, when the real estate mortgage was signed by Cynthia- Brown, it was agreed that the mortgagee would first exhaust the security on the personal property before resorting to the real estate mortgage.

The contentions of appellants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.