People v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 293·296 P. 653
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 1931Docket No. 7664.California342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dooling, J.

Appeal from a judgment against the surety on a bail bond. The bail bond was furnished in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles in a prosecution for a misdemeanor. The defendant failed to appear for trial and the bail bond was ordered forfeited.

Appellant contends that under section 1043 of the Penal Code the trial for a misdemeanor may be had in the absence of the defendant and hence the forfeiture was unwarranted. Since the taking of this appeal, however, it has been settled that Penal Code, section 1043, applies only to trials in the superior court and that under Penal Code, section 1434, the municipal court may order the bail forfeited where a defendant fails to appear therein for trial. (Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court, 102 Cal. App. 566, 569 [ 283 Pac. 345 ]; People v. Aymar, 98 Cal. App. 1 [ 276 Pac. 595 ].)

Appellant’s other point that the bond is more onerous than the requirements of section 1278 of the Penal Code is not borne out by the language of the bond. That section requires an undertaking that the defendant “will appear and answer the charge above mentioned, in whatever court it may be prosecuted, and will at all times hold himself amenable to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.