Ross

Ross v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 393·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1024·29 P.2d 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1934Docket No. 1403.California3,816 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action on July 19, 1928, seeking cancellation of a certain promissory note executed by him in the amount of $1250 and a trust deed covering real property in Biverside County which was given to secure payment of the note. Both instruments were dated April 18, 1928. The note was made payable one year after date. The payee named in the note was Charles H. Weygint. The grounds alleged in the complaint for cancellation were entire lack of consideration and fraud on the part of the payee. The original complaint named no defendant other than the payee, Charles H. Weygint. At the time the original complaint was filed a notice of lis pendens was filed in the office of the county recorder of Biverside County. This notice stated that an action had been commenced in the superior court of said county for the purpose of obtaining a decree declaring that the trust deed was void and for its cancellation. A correct legal description of the land, title to which was alleged to be affected, was set out in the notice. . On January 20, 1930, a second amended complaint and supplemental complaint was filed in the action. This pleading named as defendants in the action Title…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.