Merrill

Merrill v. Superior Court

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 501·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 292·291 P. 609
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 1930Docket No. 7488.California594 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Schmidt, J.

By the third amended complaint filed in the respondent court by more than a dozen corporations and copartnerships joined as plaintiffs against the petitioners, Inez A. Merrill and Thomas E. Merrill, wife and husband, it was alleged that petitioner Inez A. Merrill was employed jointly by the plaintiffs “as their confidential agent and fiduciary to take full charge and control of offices which they were then and there occupying in common, and of their books of account and funds, to keep said books as separate books of account and to keep said funds in the separate bank accounts of the various parties so employing her”; it being her duties “to receive and collect the sums of money due or payable to each of the plaintiffs; to indorse for deposit any checks received by any of the plaintiffs and to deposit same in the account of the designated bank for, credit to the proper plaintiff employer and to enter same in the separate books of account and to faithfully and fully account for all such funds to each of said separate plaintiffs”.

It was also alleged that during her.fiduciary employment as manager, agent and in a fiduciary capacity she, without the knowledge or consent of any of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.