Mitchell v. Superior Court
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Tyler, J.
This is a proceeding to review an order of the superior court adjudging petitioners guilty of contempt for violating a certain injunction.
Petitioner E. Forrest Mitchell is the qualified and acting insurance commissioner of the state of California, and Bernon F. Mitchell is his qualified analyst or deputy. The petition recited E. J. Carroll Co., Ltd., to he a corporation, licensed to act as an insurance broker, and that its license expired on July 1, 1932. Prior to the expiration of the same, the company applied for a renewal thereof, covering the period from the date last mentioned to July 1, 1933. Said application was made under section 633a7 of the Political Code. The application was denied for the reason the insurance commissioner determined, after due investigation and hearing, that the company had been guilty of rebating, contrary to the provisions of section 633b of the Political Code, and for the further reason that it had attempted to place business with a company not authorized to do business in this state, an act condemned under the provisions of section 596 of the Political Code.
Thereafter said corporation filed in the Superior Court in and for the City and County…