Derrer

Derrer v. Superior Court

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 154·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 996·18 P.2d 371
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1933Docket No. 8717.California640 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

Raymond A. Derrer and Walter A. Stratton were before respondent court in a contest, upon rival petitions, for a determination of the question as to which of the two should be appointed general guardian of a certain minor. The appointment was awarded to Stratton and Derrer appealed from the order making the award. Stratton then sued out a writ of habeas corpus in respondent court for the purpose of obtaining custody of the person of the minor, the custody for a long time theretofore having been in Derrer. The latter thereupon applied to this court for a writ of prohibition restraining respondent court from determining the habeas corpus proceeding and an alternative writ issued.

The writ of prohibition is available only for the purpose of halting the attempted exercise of jurisdiction not possessed by a respondent who is sought to be restrained by it (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; 21 Cal. Jur. 579), and we think a question of jurisdiction is not presented here. Petitioner relies upon In re Ballas, 53 Cal. App. 109 [ 199 Pac. 816 ]; In re Green, 67 Cal. App. 504 [ 226 Pac. 76 ]; In re Mathews, 176 Cal. 156 [ 167 Pac. 873, 874 ], The first of these eases is of no assistance to us. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.