Helm
Helm v. Washington
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Tyler, J.
These actions were brought to recover damages against the same defendants as the result of an automobile accident. The two actions were consolidated and tried together and are before this court upon a joint transcript. The facts are undisputed and the question of negligence is not an issue.
Briefly stated, defendant Washington was, at the times mentioned in the complaint, an admiral in the United States. Navy assigned as commandant of the Twelfth Naval District wherein the accident occurred. Defendant Brown was an enlisted man in the United States Navy and was acting as chauffeur for the admiral. Brown was directed to drive to Bohemian Grove where the admiral frequently went for recreation and exercise. Having transported him to the place mentioned, defendant Brown proceeded to return to navy headquarters as originally directed and ordered by his superiors. It was on his return, and while the admiral was not with him, that the car he was driving and which was owned by the government collided with the car of plaintiff, as a result of which collision this action was brought.
The case was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Damages were assessed in the sum of $3,500 in…