McFate

McFate v. Zuckerman

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 172·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 942·19 P.2d 532
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1933Docket No. 1001.California2,602 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in his favor in the amount of $25,000. The sole ground of the appeal is inadequacy of damages.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover from defendants the sum of $148,880.55 damages alleged to have been suffered by him as the result of certain false and fraudulent representations made to him by defendants Zuckerman and Gordon whereby he was induced to exchange ranch property at Paso Robles, California, for an apartment house in the city of Los Angeles owned by defendant Zuckerman. The false representations upon which it is alleged that plaintiff relied and which induced him to make the exchange related to the value of the apartment house and to the income derived therefrom through rentals of apartments. In addition to damages plaintiff also sought equitable relief through the cancellation of a certain note and mortgage executed by defendant Zuckerman and his wife in favor of defendant Merchants National Trust and Savings Bank and a second note and deed of trust executed by plaintiff and his wife in favor of defendant Zuckerman. The issue of damages was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.