Diller

California Thorn Cordage, Inc. v. Diller

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 542·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1249·9 P.2d 594
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1932Docket No. 7747.California3,396 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

At the time of filing the amended complaint in this action (March 31, 1928), the defendant William Diller was a stockholder and director of plaintiff corporation, and also was a creditor of plaintiff. As such creditor he held several notes of the corporation, some of which were secured by mortgage and others were unsecured. Although Elizabeth Diller is named as a defendant, she had no part in the transactions now to be considered, and it will be convenient and sufficient to refer to William Diller as the defendant, or as the appellant, and to describe the plaintiff and respondent as the Corporation.

At the time above mentioned there were pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County several actions of Diller against the Corporation, as follows: No. 240962, on a note for the principal sum of $6,873,90; No. 240963, on a note for the principal sum of $23,041.50; No. 240964, for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage given to secure a note of which the principal sum was $15,000; No. 240965, for the foreclosure of a real property mortgage given to secure a note of which the principal sum was $60,000.

The objects of the present action as set forth in the prayer of the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.