Gloria

Gloria v. A. Colonia Portuguesa

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 268·299 P. 807
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1931Docket No. 7829.California333 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued for libel. Before trial he voluntarily dismissed as to defendant Roderick and judgment was entered for her. She filed a cost bill, claiming $100 as counsel fees. Plaintiff moved to tax costs; his motion was denied; and he appeals from the order upon typewritten transcripts.

Respondent was entitled to the allowance for attorney’s fees under section 7 of the act of 1871 (Stats. 1871-72, p. 533), which reads: “In case the action is dismissed, or the defendant recover judgment, he shall be allowed $100.00 to cover counsel fees. ...” (Caffey v. Mann, 3 Cal. App. 125 , 126 [ 84 Pac. 424 ]; Hills v. Shaffer, 96 Cal. App. 520, 522 [ 274 Pac. 388 ]; Ream v. Barr, 108 Cal. App. 172 [ 291 Pac. 451 ]; Wheatland v. Maloney, 110 Cal. App. 288 [ 294 Pac. 499 ].) That when two or more defendants are sued jointly in actions of this character each defendant is entitled to the allowance for counsel fees is the rule of Hills v. Shaffer, supra, and the cases following.

Appellant argues that these cases are not applicable because he has not dismissed the action as to all defendants ; but the rights of respondent are not dependent upon what appellant may do as to other parties sued. Her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.