Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Nichols

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 738·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 186·294 P. 758
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1930Docket No. 174.California1,348 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cary, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for injuries received in a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s truck. From a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff Gonzalez and against defendant, defendant appeals.

As grounds for reversal the defendant contends: (1) That the evidence fails to establish negligence; (2) that the evidence shows contributory negligence as a matter of law; (3) that the court erroneously admitted certain evidence; (4) that the court erred in giving and refusing certain instructions, and (5) that the court erred in permitting certain questions to be asked on- the examination of the jurors.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the facts follow: The accident took place between 1 and 2 o ’clock in the morning on the main highway leading from Imperial Valley north to the city of Riverside, at a point some eight or ten miles south of the station of Whitewater. The road is paved and on either side of the pavement are shoulders of hard-packed sand sufficiently wide to allow a vehicle such as defendant’s truck to be parked thereon. There are several storm drains or dips in the road in this vicinity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.