Behymer

Behymer v. Superior Court

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 464·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·123 P. 340
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 1912Civ. No. 1123.California754 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Application for a peremptory writ of mandate commanding the superior court and the Honorable George H. Hutton, judge thereof, to vacate and set aside an order dismissing an appeal from a judgment rendered in the justice’s court in an action wherein one O. W. Hobbs was plaintiff and petitioner was defendant.

The judgment from which the appeal was taken was rendered on September 26, 1911, on which date defendant served his notice of appeal and filed the required undertaking, which action was followed, on October 3, 1911, by depositing with the clerk of the'superior court a transcript of the justice’s docket and the files and papers required upon hearing the case on appeal. The order of dismissal was made upon a motion based upon the ground that appellant had failed and neglected to pay to the clerk of the court the sum of six dollars as a deposit for costs, as required by rule 27 of the superior court, which is as follows: “In any civil action appealed from an inferior court, if the transcript and papers are not filed in the clerk’s office and six dollars paid to the clerk as a deposit for costs, within thirty days after the notice of appeal and undertaking on appeal are filed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.