Woodson

People v. Woodson

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 185·29 Cal. App. 531·156 P. 378
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 1916Crim. No. 340.California1,860 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced in section 269b of the Penal Code as follows: “If two persons, each being married to another, live together in a state of cohabitation and adultery, each is guilty of a felony, and punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not exceeding five years.”

After a careful reading of the entire testimony we are led to say that the evidence is abundantly sufficient to support the verdict. We may accept the rule insisted upon by appellant that, in order to warrant a conviction, “there must be an assumption of the conjugal relations, such as sleeping together, occupying the same room or bed at night, having sexual intercourse with each other as though married, and many other relations that are summed up appropriately by the words ‘cohabiting with,’ and cohabitation alone is not enough under the code; there must be sexual intercourse between them. Adultery and occasional acts are not enough,” then the showing made by the people measures up fully to the requirement. Indeed, the evidence of guilt seems exceptionally strong when we consider the usual difficulty of establishing such a charge. The inculpatory facts and circumstances are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.