Rich

Rich v. Connelly

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 224·52 Cal. App. 556·199 P. 540
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 1921Civ. No. 2297.California1,969 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Application for writ of prohibition. On the fourth day of October, 1920, a petition was filed with the board of supervisors of Solano County, having for its purpose the formation of an irrigation district to be known as Suisun irrigation district. On the same day the board of supervisors of said county passed its resolution, wherein and whereby it appears that the board found and determined that the petition for the formation of said district complied in all particulars with the law, had been properly advertised, and contained the requisite number of genuine signatures. On October 6th a copy of this resolution was forwarded to the state engineer. On November 24, 1920, the state engineer reported adversely to the board of supervisors, which report was received and filed by the clerk of said board on the twenty-sixth day of said month. On December 6, 1920, being the first regular meeting of the board of supervisors following the receipt of the state engineer’s report, there was a general continuance of all matters pertaining to said petition until Monday, January 3, 1921. On January 3, 1921, there was another general continuance until January 17. In the meantime, and on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.