Leballister

Leballister v. Morris

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 167·59 Cal. App. 699·211 P. 851
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1922Civ. No. 2524.California1,165 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendants and the record is presented by the alternative method. Appellants have filed herein only what is denominated “Appellants’ Opening Brief.” Therein they have not set out the pleadings or the evidence in the case, but have contented themselves with the discussion of the legal question whether a vendee by failure to make payments at the time specified in a written contract for the sale of real property, wherein time is made of the essence thereof, does not subject himself to the penalty of forfeiture. The consideration, though, as thus presented is of no assistance in the absence of an exposition of the particular facts of the case. However, what has been omitted by appellant has been supplied by respondents, and as the statement by the latter is not denied by the former, we may virtually adopt it as a proper portrayal of the real situation. On August 8, 1919, a written agreement of the sale and purchase of a tract of land near Gridley, in Butte county, for the sum of $20,000 was executed by the parties herein. ' Four thousand dollars were paid by respondents at that time and it was agreed that the balance should be paid in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.