People v. Wickersham

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 724·98 Cal. App. 502·277 P. 121
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1929Docket No. 1751.California1,267 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

Appellant was charged by indictment consisting of three counts with grand theft, it being alleged that he unlawfully and feloniously stole, took and carried away (1) thirty-two thousand shares of corporate stock, (2) a deed of trust, and (3) two thousand five hundred dollars in money, the property of another. He was convicted upon all charges, a motion for a new trial was presented, which was denied, and he appeals from the judgments and order denying said motion.

The evidence tended to show that the defendant unlawfully-obtained possession of the personal property mentioned by representations that he was interested in a valuable mine which he had incorporated, and in which he would profitably invest for the owners of the securities and money. It subsequently developed that Wickersham had neither a mine nor a corporation, but that he had surreptitiously secured about seventy thousand dollars worth of property of the complaining witnesses for his own benefit, and converted it to his personal uses and purposes. It is first contended that appellant was deprived of his constitutional rights by the failure of the indictment to inform him as to the manner in which the People intended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.