Allen

Allen v. Freear

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 181·50 Cal. App. 645·195 P. 748
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1920Civ. No. 3656.California1,133 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This action was brought to have a trust declared in certain property.

The substance of the facts as disclosed by the findings shows that on the eighteenth day of April, 1914, L. L. Bateman was the owner and in possession of certain personal property described as all the stock in trade, including groceries and general merchandise, in a certain store located in Kern County, the value of which was approximately $4,000. Bateman was financially involved, and on the day last mentioned he entered into an agreement with the defendant Freear to transfer the business over to him. Notice of his intention so to do was recorded and pursuant to such notice a sale was subsequently made. The only consideration for this transfer was that Freear should take possession of the business, conduct the same, and pay off Bateman’s indebtedness, upon the happening of which event Freear was to reconvey to Bateman a one-half interest in the property. At the time of the transfer Freear was familiar with the different claims against Bateman. Among these was one held by plaintiff and one of the defendants, Stephenson. Allen and Stephenson at the time of the transfer were guarantors on two promissory notes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.