Carlton

Carlton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 50·39 Cal. App. 321·178 P. 869
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1918Civ. No. 2612.California820 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Plaintiff prosecuted this action for the purpose of securing damages caused to him by reason of a collision which occurred in December, 1913, between an automobile which the plaintiff was driving and a car of the defendant corporation. The damages sought to be recovered were the cost of repairs to the automobile. The accident occurred at the intersection of two streets. It was alleged that the defendant was negligent in the operation of its car. The court, sitting without a jury, made its findings of fact, in which it determined that, while the servant of the defendant was negligent in not looking in the direction from which plaintiff was coming, plaintiff was guilty of such contributory negligence as to bar recovery of damages. The appeal is from the judgment as entered and from an order denying to plaintiff a new trial.

At the point where the accident occurred, North Broadway Street, in the city of Los Angeles, runs in a north and south direction. Daly Street, upon which the tracks of defendant are located, extends easterly and westerly. North Broadway is a paved street. At the time of and just prior to the accident rain had been falling and the pavement was wet. Plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.