Martin

Martin v. Fisher

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 34·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 172·291 P. 276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 1930Docket No. 112.California923 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marks, J.

Respondent was a teacher with a certificate authorizing her to teach in the elementary grades in California. The Escondido School District was a school district in San Diego County employing more than eight teachers under a principal who devoted more than two hours a day to the supervision of the schools under his control. Appellants compose the hoard of trustees of the school district. For brevity, the Escondido School District will be referred to hereafter as the district, and its board of trustees as the appellants.

In July, 1920, respondent entered into a written contract with the district to teach in its elementary school for one year. Her contract was renewed yearly thereafter until 1925, when appellants notified her that she would not be employed for the school year 1925-1926. No charges were filed against her and she had no hearing on this dismissal. It is admitted that in 1925 she was a permanent teacher as defined in section 1609 of the Political Code.

In April, 1926, respondent filed her petition in the Superior Court of San Diego County, seeking a writ of mandate compelling her reinstatement as a teacher of the district. After a trial of this action, judgment was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.